Is the British prerogative a critical section of the British Constitution : an analysis

Educator

New member
This article has been written by Randeep S Rana, pursuing
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, and has been edited by Oishika Banerji (Team
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
).

It has been published by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.


Introduction​


British prerogative or in simple words Royal prerogative is a birthright accorded to the Royal families under the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Under the same, a King/Queen/Monarch can act on his/her own will without any approval/assent of the Parliament of a Nation and no question can be raised upon his/her Majesty’s act before a court of law. It is a noteworthy constituent of the British Constitution. A prerogative, warrants a person to deploy forces, declare wars, grant pardons, regulate civil services, sign treaties, to grant honours and awards among many other privileges. This article discusses whether the British prerogative is to be considered as a critical section of the British Constitution or not.

Historical perspective on British prerogative​


Royal prerogatives were established in a time when the monarch had absolute power, which was considered to be derived from God. The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of Royal Prerogative goes to the middle ages where the King had supreme authority of the Kingdom and as a prerogative, a King could not be made answerable in his own court. It was based on the principles that a “King can do no wrong”, “a King never dies” and “a King can not be bound by statute unless the statute said so” and statues were made by a King. In those times, the king was both the feudal lord and the head of the kingdom, at the same time. The king had a residual power to deliver justice and there was no court where a king could be prosecuted/sued, the king himself with his council of acts as a court and delivered justice and the decision of the King shall be final cannot be challenged anywhere.

Two eminent jurists of their time Blackstone and Dicey had their different views upon the Royal prerogatives. While Balckstone claimed the Royal prerogatives can be applied to the rights which a King/Queen can relish alone and not in common among the kingdom, Dicey had a view that prerogative is a residue of an arbitrary and discretionary command which was legally handed in the hands of a King/Queen/Monarch. However, from long ago, Royal prerogatives were considered an embarrassment or a disgrace to the British Constitution because of its unquestionable authority and against the rule of law.

Soon questions started arising upon these discretionary and arbitrary powers of kings and the main shift was caused after
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
when these discretionary powers were limited which were absolute prior to this time. Later then came the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
which added more hindrance in the Monarch’s powers. And after
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
parliament started opposing and questioned the absolutism of Monarch’s power.

With time, it became established that the bulk of prerogative powers could be exercised only through and on the advice of ministers responsible to Parliament. Although the monarch retained formal power of appointment and removal of ministers and ministries, the development of collective ministerial responsibility made it increasingly difficult for the King or Queen to exercise such power freely against the wishes of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. However, the ability of ministers to rely on prerogative powers continues to give rise to problems of accountability.

Present scenario​

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Royal Prerogatives these days are considered to be the quintessential source of the British Constitution. The role of Parliament nowadays is increased and Royal Prerogative no longer can be said as discretionary power. However Monarch is a nominal head of the Government. All functions are exercised by the council of ministers but under the name of the Monarch. In present times powers of Monarch are very limited and they are strictly subject to common law, freedom of citizens and any statute and Monarch can longer be absolute authority of power and rights of citizens and law comes before the discretion of the Monarch. The majority of these Royal prerogatives are exercised by ministers in the name of crown and they can act without any concurrence of the Parliament.

Types of Royal prerogatives​


These prerogatives can be exercised either personally or politically.

Personal prerogative​

  1. No criminal proceeding is maintainable in the name of Monarch in person, it is based on the belief that a King can do no wrong. However, civil immunity of the Monarch had been removed by “
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    )”.
  2. The Monarch always remains; only the person holding the Monarch is changed, it is believed that the “King never dies”.
  3. King cannot be an infant and a King is not bound by any statute unless it is expressly declared by that particular statute.

Political prerogatives​


Political prerogatives can further be detailed in subclasses

  1. Administrative Prerogative – Monarch is responsible for appointment of Prime Minister (Leader of Majority ) and other members of cabinet. Monarch is also the head of the Armed forces and the members of the Armed forces are also recruited by Monarch.
  2. Legislative Prerogative – Monarch can summon or dissolve the Parliament with the consent of ministers, however legally he can do so without the consent of ministers but the act would be unconstitutional. Also a bill, in order to become an Act, needs the approval of the crown.
  3. Judicial Prerogatives – This is also termed as mercy prerogative which further be divided in two parts : –
  1. Grant of Pardon – Pardon can be granted with or without imposing any conditions thereon. The Crown can grant pardon on the advice of the Home Secretary and it is subject to the judicial review as held in case of “
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    [1985] AC 374, [1985] ICR 14”.
  2. Grant of nolle prosecui – It means stopping of legal proceedings against a person but it does not result in acquittal rather the accused can be later on charged for the same charge. The Attorney General of England and Wales can act in the name of the crown while exercising this power.
  3. Foreign and Other Prerogatives- Declaring war and peace, signing of treaties, recognising status of foreign countries, etc are some of many foreign prerogatives. Apart from this Crown also appoints Bishops in church on advice of Prime Minister , grant of awards on advice of executive, etc.

Judicial impact of British prerogative on the Constitution​


In
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
[1990] 2 AC 580, Lord Keith restated the immunity provided to the Crown and these immunities also apply to Crown’s servants undertaking certain activities of the state.

In
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
[1994] QB 552 the court was unwilling to question the use of the prerogative power to sign and ratify the Treaty of the European Union. The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
created a justiciable right to a referendum and consequently the denial of a referendum could have been challenged via the courts.

In
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
it was suggested that when a statute is created and put in the dominating position the prerogatives powers will automatically be docked.

Conclusion​


In toto it can be analysed that Royal prerogatives are still in a dominating position and the supremacy of Crown/Monarch cannot be omitted when we discuss its prevalence in the British Constitution. However, the degree of arbitrariness and discretion is not as much reflected as it was seen in the mediaeval period when the King was considered to be the fountain of Justice and the guardian of peace. The British Constitution needs a reforming amendment pertaining to the Royal Prerogative but every strong building stands needs a strong foundation to stand tall and small steps towards it would ultimately result in reformation of the British Constitution where the citizen’s rights would have more privileges than of the Crown.

References​

  1. Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
  2. Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
  3. Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    .


Students of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Follow us on
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and subscribe to our
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
channel for more amazing legal content.

The post
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
appeared first on
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
 
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock